Status – None. Although Neb`s language. Rev. Stat. 52-123 complies with the statutes of trust funds in other states, the Nebraska Supreme Court has ruled that the status does not create a trust fund or trust of the holder (State v. McConnell, 266 N.W.2d 219, 222 (Neb. 1978). A qualified personal housing fund removes the residence of a fellow from the estate. A Trust Land allows the trust to manage the property held in trust. An Asset Protection Trust (APT) is created to protect a person`s assets from the claims of future creditors.
A living trust, also known as a revoked trust, allows a Grantor to better control assets over the life of the donor. This is a type of trust in which a donor brings assets to a trust that can then be transferred to any number of designated beneficiaries after the death of the beneficiary. Most of the time it has been used to transfer assets to children or grandchildren, the main advantage of living trust is that assets avoid estates, resulting in a rapid distribution of assets to beneficiaries. Living trusts are not made public, which means that an estate with a high level of privacy is distributed. While the Grantor is still alive – and is not unable to act – the details of trust can be changed or revoked. As mentioned above, some government trust fund laws create personal responsibility for executives, directors or executives of construction industry companies.  This legal personal liability is similar to the personal guarantee of an officer or director. If the group goes bankrupt, a creditor can no longer sue the group. However, the creditor is free to sue the personal surety unless the personal surety files for bankruptcy. Code.
Ann. No. 43-13 is a penal code and does not provide for a private right of action imposing civil liability (Vansant- Gusler, Inc. v. Washington, 245 Va. 356, 429 S.E. 2d 31 (1993)). Will. Code. Ann.. 43-13 requires that funds paid to the general contractor or subcontractors be used to pay for people performing tasks or supplies.
While funds paid to a general contractor or subcontractor are to be used to pay the subcontractors of the general contractor or subcontractor, these are not trust funds, as the statutes do not mention the creation of legal trust (Kayhoe Construction Corp. v. United Virginia Bank, 220 va. 285,257 S.E.237 (1979)).  Lovett v. Homrich, Inc. (In re Philip Services Corp.) 359 B.R. 616 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2006); Cunningham v.
T – R Demolition, Inc. (In re ML – Assocs.), 301 B.R. 195, 200 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2003) [Since the preferred defendant was unable to track project payments through bank accounts, the predilection could not demonstrate that the funds received were trust funds.  Constructive Trust: The St. Joe Company v. Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, 283 Va. 403, 722 S.E.2d 622 (2012); Express Trust: Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.
v. Khan (In re Khan), 461 B.R. 343, 350 (E.D. Va. 2011) [An agreement allowing the entry of trust funds with other non-trust funds does not deny the existence of a fiduciary relationship]; The use of funds by an agent does not in itself destroy an explicit trust: Wolff v. United States, IRS (In re FirstPay, Inc.), 773 F.3d 583, 592 (4. Cir. Cir. Mr.
2014; In re Warner-Quinlan Co., 86 F.2d 103 (2d Cir.